Wall-clock runtime
Wall-clock results describe the end-to-end runtime of the present workflow. They can remain long because computational correctness, reproducibility, and traceability still have priority over aggressive optimization.
Measurement-first research layer
Independent ARM64 benchmark and validation program focused on reproducible prime-counting observations and controlled archive interpretation.
The current release separates wall-clock runtime of the intentionally unoptimized workflow from clean-binary timing with detailed instrumentation disabled. Optimization and deeper instrumentation will follow in a later phase.
Validation first. Performance claims only after complete canonical comparison.
Measurement protocol
Wall-clock results describe the end-to-end runtime of the present workflow. They can remain long because computational correctness, reproducibility, and traceability still have priority over aggressive optimization.
Clean-binary timing is reported as an indicative throughput signal with detailed instrumentation disabled. It is methodologically different from wall-clock runtime and should not be collapsed into the same speed claim.
More detailed instrumentation will be introduced after the current correctness-focused phase is stabilized and optimization work becomes the active priority.
Limit, step, execution mode, and archive tier are always reported together. The numeric result is therefore read as a bounded observation, not as an isolated slogan.
Limit, step, execution mode, and archive tier are always reported together. The numeric result is therefore read as a bounded observation, not as an isolated slogan.
The current release keeps computational accuracy and reproducible output ahead of optimization speed.
Clean-binary timing remains indicative until later instrumentation turns it into a fully auditable performance layer.
The public presentation layer stops at 10B, while 100B, 200B, and 500B remain controlled archive evidence.
Benchmark board
Wall-clock runtime, clean-binary timing, and controlled archive evidence are separate methodological objects. They must be read in their own context before any speed claim is made.
The site is written to keep the scientific reading explicit: correctness-first workflow, long wall-clock runtime, and indicative binary timing are not merged into a single number.
Archive integrity
This bundle contains the current performance evidence used for the measurement analysis.
The current source directory is the primary working boundary for measured data, validation outputs, and program sources.
Public pages stop at 10B. 100B, 200B, and 500B remain controlled archive evidence and are included in the GOLD package of detailed overviews and measurements.
Project memory
Vize, identita a publikační základ
MAYAN_ALFA is built as an observation-first research environment for benchmark discipline, deterministic validation, reproducible datasets, and long-term archive integrity.
In the current phase, the project prioritizes zero-error computational results up to 10 billion numbers in the public release layer and up to 500 billion numbers in controlled archive evidence. Speed optimization is reserved for later phases.
| LIMIT | MAYAN_ALFA | MR ONLY | PRIMESIEVE | π(N) | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10M | 1.684354 s | 3.604905 s | 1.000000 s | 664579 | OK |
| 100M | 0.360000 s | 23.874431 s | 1.000000 s | 5761455 | OK |
| 1B | 1.793206 s | 244.145627 s | 9.000000 s | 50847534 | OK |
| 10B | 18.806417 s | NOT RUN | 94.000000 s | 455052511 | OK |
Added to cart
Check out our shop to see what's available
Oznámení